AI-generated video was supposed to revolutionise content marketing by now. Photorealistic clips from simple text prompts! Endless creative possibilities! But in reality, it's cool tech solving problems most B2B marketers don't actually have.

First things first: the technology is remarkable. Sora creates 60-second photorealistic videos. Google Veo offers strong quality with enterprise features. HeyGen can translate videos into multiple languages with lip-sync. Runway, Kling AI and Synthesia all produce impressive results.
We've tried out most of these tools, and the quality has improved dramatically. The outputs can look genuinely professional. But for a small B2B marketing agency, we're not creating enough video content to justify the investment.
The content we create most often just doesn't benefit from AI video generation tools. They solve different problems than we have. We mostly create:
AI can generate a video, but it can't generate authenticity. And in B2B, authenticity is what creates trust and sells.
While it's not useful for our bread and butter, we have found specific use cases where AI video generation is genuinely valuable.
Creative, illustrative content: We used Google Veo for a board game project where we needed card artwork with small animations. For creative projects where "photorealistic" isn't the goal, it works brilliantly and saves budget.
In other words, AI video works when volume, speed, or cost make traditional production impractical.
AI video generation tools are definitely impressive. We use them when they make sense, but it's not transforming our day-to-day video work quite yet. Here's when we recommend (not) using these kinds of tools:
Use AI video when:
Stick with traditional when:
We're keeping an eye on things. In another year or two, the tools might be good and affordable enough that they make sense for more of our work. But right now, they're solving problems we don't have very often.
Curious about which options we offer for B2B video content?
.avif)